Sudden bee deaths: poisoning, disease, or something else

A carpet of dead bees in front of a hive looks like poisoning, and sometimes it is. It can also be a virus, robbing, starvation or a failing queen. What each looks like, what sits badly with each, what settles the question — and where, in England, a suspected poisoning is investigated.

Bee biologyReviewed 2026-10-30

A pile of dead bees is a question

Finding many dead or dying bees in front of a hive is alarming, and the first explanation most people reach for is a pesticide. Sometimes that is right. But the scene a beekeeper sees — bees dead on the landing board, others trembling, crawling, unable to fly — is produced by several different things, and the sign alone does not say which. A virus can do it. So can a robbing fight, a cold spell after a dearth, or a colony running out of food.

From dead bees at the hive to an answerFive boxes in a column joined by arrows: what you see, what to ask, what it could be, what settles it — a sample screened for disease and residues — and who to tell.1. What you seeMany dead or dying bees, trembling or crawling,appearing within days2. What to askOne colony or many? Several apiaries in a district?After spraying or drilling nearby? Wings normal?3. What it could bePoisoning, chronic bee paralysis, robbing, starvation— a sign narrows these; it ranks none of them4. What settles itA fresh sample of the dead bees, screened for diseaseand analysed for residues5. Who to tellIn England: the National Bee Unit, for the incidentscheme. Elsewhere: the national authority
Five steps from finding many dead or dying bees to an answer. What you see is the same for several causes. The questions that matter are about the scene: one colony or many, one apiary or a district, whether spraying or drilling happened nearby, and whether the bees' wings are whole. Poisoning, chronic bee paralysis, robbing and starvation all remain possible, in no order. What settles it is a fresh sample of the dead bees, screened for disease and analysed for residues. In England a suspected pesticide incident goes to the National Bee Unit for the Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme; elsewhere, the national authority says what to do. Sources: Investigation procedures in England (Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme); Bee poisoning incidents in Germany in spring 2008 caused by abrasion of active substance from treated seeds during sowing of maize; Chronic bee paralysis: an information note for beekeepers (Fact Sheet 10). Drawing: HoneyHQ (HEKNO Ltd), original.

What you see, and what could cause it

The table works from the sign. Each row gives what a beekeeper sees, the things that could produce it — in no order — the questions that make one more or less plausible, what would sit badly with the obvious reading, what settles it, and when an official report is the next step. Read across any row and the pattern holds: the sign narrows the possibilities, and something else decides between them.

What you see, what could cause it, and what would settle it
What you seeCould beHow specificAskSits badly with the first readingWhat settles itReporting
Many dead or dying bees in front of the hive, appearing within a day or twoAcute pesticide poisoning; Chronic bee paralysis; Robbing, with bees dead from fighting; StarvationLow — shared with several other causesWere many colonies, or several apiaries in one district, hit in the same days, during foraging weather, after spraying or drilling nearby? Or one colony, building over weeks?The NBU notes that poisoning tends to leave dead bees across the apiary, while chronic bee paralysis piles them at one entrance — a pattern, not a rule. Trembling, flightless bees, some hairless and shiny black, in one colony alone sit badly with a single exposure across an apiary.A disease screen and residue analysis of a fresh sample of the dead bees. Neither reading of the scene settles it.In England, a suspected pesticide incident goes to the National Bee Unit and the Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme. Elsewhere, ask the national authority.
Bees trembling, crawling and unable to fly, with abnormal wing movementsAcute pesticide poisoning; Chronic bee paralysis; Deformed wing virus; Tracheal mite (acarapisosis)Low — shared with several other causesDo the crawling bees have whole, normal wings? Is the varroa count high? Did it start suddenly across colonies, or slowly in one?Crumpled, shrivelled wings belong with a high mite load and deformed wing virus, not with poisoning. In the 2008 German incident the signs were cramping and disorientation within days of drilling, in thousands of colonies at once.A mite count, and a laboratory test of adult bees for viruses and, where poisoning is suspected, for residues.In England, a suspected pesticide incident goes to the National Bee Unit and the Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme. None of the viruses is notifiable in the UK nations or Ireland.
A hive with stores and capped brood but few or no adult bees, and few dead beesVarroa; Acute pesticide poisoning; Absconding or a late swarm; Nosemosis (Nosema, or Vairimorpha)Low — shared with several other causesWhat were the mite counts through late summer? Was the colony small going into winter? In Northern Ireland's 2025-26 survey, 18 of 50 colonies found dead or empty had only a few dead bees in or around the hive.Plenty of dead bees in the hive points away from bees being lost in the field. Dead workers head-first in cells points to food.The mite record, a sample of any remaining bees for Nosema and viruses, and the brood examined for disease.Only if a notifiable brood disease is suspected in what is left: then the national rule applies.
Dead workers head-first in cells after winterStarvation; Isolation, with stores present but out of reach in the cold; VarroaModerate — narrows it down, confirms nothingWhere were the stores in relation to the cluster? Was the hive light at hefting? Was the colony small in autumn? Northern Ireland beekeepers reported dead workers in cells without food in 8, and with food still present in 20, of 50 dead colonies in 2025-26.Dead bees with stores filling the frames around them do not fit simple starvation.An inspection of where the bees died and where the food was. There is no laboratory test.None, unless a notifiable brood disease is seen in the brood.
No eggs, or drone brood scattered in worker cells, after winter or in summerQueen failure; Laying workers in a long-queenless colony; A pause in laying, or a virgin queen not yet layingModerate — narrows it down, confirms nothingIs there a queen to be found, and are eggs single and centred? Has the colony swarmed? In Northern Ireland in 2025-26 beekeepers put 66 of 130 winter losses down to unsolvable queen problems.Sunken, perforated cappings or discoloured larvae point to a brood disease, not to the queen.Inspections a few days apart for a laying queen and eggs.None, unless brood disease is suspected.
Fighting at the entrance, torn cappings and stores emptying fastRobbing by bees from other colonies; Social wasps robbing in late summer; A colony already weakened by something elseLow — shared with several other causesIs it late summer, when wasp nests are at their largest? Are the robbers wasps or bees? Has syrup or honey been spilt nearby? Was the colony small?A weak colony that is robbed may have been failing first; the robbing is often the end of the story, not the start. A colony robbed out can spread American foulbrood spores to the robbers.Watching the entrance to see who is entering, and inspecting the robbed colony's brood for disease.Only if foulbrood is suspected in the robbed colony; then the national rule applies.
Hornets hovering at the entrances, and bees no longer flying outYellow-legged hornet hunting foragers; European hornet, which usually takes only a few beesLow — shared with several other causesAre the hornets dark, with yellow leg-ends and one orange band near the tail, or brown and yellow with dark leg-ends? Where are you? The yellow-legged hornet is non-native everywhere in Europe; the European hornet is native in Britain and across much of Europe.A large brown-and-yellow hornet taking an occasional bee is the native species behaving normally.A photograph sent to the authority. Identification is verified from the picture, not from a description.Report a suspected yellow-legged hornet in Great Britain, Northern Ireland and Ireland through the routes in the reporting table. Do not report, trap or kill the native hornet.
Patchy brood with sunken, darkened or pierced cappingsAmerican foulbrood; European foulbrood; Sacbrood; Parasitic mite syndrome; Chilled broodSuggestive — still needs a testThe brood differential sets these out in full. Poisoning is not the first thought here: the sources read describe its effects on adult bees.Healthy plump pupae under uncapped cells in lines are bald brood, not disease.A lateral flow test by an inspector, or a laboratory sample.A suspicion of either foulbrood is reported at once in every UK nation and in Ireland.

The possibilities are listed in no order and carry no score: a sign narrows them, and only a test, a count or an inspection settles one. No sign here diagnoses poisoning, and none diagnoses its absence.

Checked 2026-10-30 against: Bee poisoning incidents in Germany in spring 2008 caused by abrasion of active substance from treated seeds during sowing of maize (Julius-Kühn-Archiv 423 (Pistorius, Bischoff, Heimbach and Stähler; Julius Kühn-Institut), 2009); Chronic bee paralysis: an information note for beekeepers (Fact Sheet 10) (National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency, 2024); Investigation procedures in England (Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme) (Health and Safety Executive, 2026); Wasps (National Bee Unit fact sheet) (Animal and Plant Health Agency, National Bee Unit, 2026); Chapter 3.2.7. Varroosis of honey bees (infestation of honey bees with Varroa spp.) (WOAH Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, 2021); Northern Ireland Honey Bee Husbandry Survey 2025-26 (Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (Kirbas, Spaans and Murchie), 2026); Chapter 3.2.4. Nosemosis of honey bees (WOAH Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, 2024); Feeding sugar to bees (Best Practice Guideline No. 7a) (National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency, 2026); Preparing honey bee colonies for winter (Fact Sheet 19) (National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency, 2026); Foulbrood disease of honey bees and other common brood disorders (National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency, 2025); Chapter 3.2.2. American foulbrood of honey bees (infection of honey bees with Paenibacillus larvae) (WOAH Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals); European hornet (Vespa crabro): bug directory (Buglife — The Invertebrate Conservation Trust); DAERA issues fresh appeal for public vigilance over Asian hornet sightings (Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Northern Ireland), 2026); Chapter 3.2.3. European foulbrood of honey bees (infection of honey bees with Melissococcus plutonius) (WOAH Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals); Honey bees: protecting them from pests and diseases (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs; Animal and Plant Health Agency, 2024); The Bee Diseases and Pests Control (England) Order 2006 (SI 2006/342), article 2 (legislation.gov.uk, 2006); The Bee Diseases and Pests Control (Scotland) Order 2007 (S.S.I. 2007 No. 506) (legislation.gov.uk, 2007); The Bee Diseases and Pests Control Order (Northern Ireland) 2007 (S.R. 2007 No. 246) (legislation.gov.uk, 2007); Yellow-legged hornet: status, monitoring and reporting (BeeBase) (Animal and Plant Health Agency, National Bee Unit, 2026); Every sighting matters! Why your report matters in the fight against the yellow-legged hornet (Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA Science blog, GOV.UK), 2026); DAERA urges vigilance as Asian hornet monitoring begins in Dundonald (Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Northern Ireland), 2026); Incidents involving pesticides and animals: Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme (Natural England, Food and Environment Research Agency and HSE, 2012); Honey bee Health Surveillance Programme (guidance document) (Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (Ireland), 2020); Infection of honey bees with Paenibacillus larvae (American foulbrood) (Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (Ireland), Animal Health Surveillance, 2023); Ireland's response to the Asian hornet 2025: lessons and next steps (National Biodiversity Data Centre, for the Asian Hornet Management Group (Ireland), 2026); Asian hornet (invasives.ie) (National Biodiversity Data Centre (Ireland)).

Some of the context questions do a lot of work. Poisoning from a spray or from drilling treated seed usually reaches many colonies at once, often in several apiaries in one district, in good foraging weather and within days of the field work. The National Bee Unit's account of chronic bee paralysis contrasts it in exactly those terms: poisoning tends to leave dead bees across the apiary, while the virus piles them at one entrance, with trembling, flightless bees, some hairless, black and shiny. Crumpled wings point to deformed wing virus and a high mite load instead. None of these contrasts is a rule; each is a reason to ask the next question.

When it is not an infection

Three common causes of a dead or dying colony are not infections at all. Starvation leaves workers dead head-first in cells, with no stores near the cluster; in winter a cluster can also starve with food a few centimetres away, if the cold stops it moving. A failing queen leaves a colony without eggs, or with drone brood scattered in worker cells, and it dwindles. And acute poisoning, when it happens, kills foragers in the field and at the hive within days.

Losses that are not infections: what they can look like, and what settles them
CauseWhat it isWhat you might seeCan be confused withWhat settles it
Acute pesticide poisoningNone — an insecticide or other toxic residue, not an organismLarge numbers of dying bees in front of and inside the hive within days; cramping, disoriented movement and abnormal wing movements; mortality that can stay raised for weeks and leave colonies weakened.Chronic bee paralysis virus — trembling, crawling bees and dead bees at the entrance; Starvation in a dearth or a cold spell; Robbing, which leaves bees dead from fighting at the entranceResidue analysis of a fresh sample of dead bees, with a disease screen alongside: a residue found does not by itself show that it killed the bees, and a disease can produce the same picture. In England the National Bee Unit screens for disease and the Wildlife Incident Unit analyses for pesticides.
StarvationNone — the colony runs out of food it can reachDead workers head-first in cells with no stores left near the cluster; a hive that has felt lighter at each hefting. A cluster can also die beside stores it could not move to in the cold.A colony that collapsed from varroa and viruses and was then robbed of its stores; Isolation in cold weather, where food was present but out of reachAn inspection of where the stores were and where the cluster died. There is no laboratory test for it, and a disease sample is worth taking if the colony was also small or brood looked abnormal.
Queen failureNone — the colony loses its laying queen or she stops laying fertilised eggsNo eggs or young larvae in the active season; drone brood in worker cells, scattered among the worker brood; several eggs to a cell where workers have started laying.A pause in laying in a dearth or after a swarm; A virgin queen not yet laying, which is easy to missFinding, or failing to find, a laying queen and single eggs centred in cells, over more than one inspection.

A sign narrows the possibilities; it does not settle them. Every condition here has a look-alike, most infections show no sign at all, and finding an organism is not finding the disease. What confirms each one is a test or an inspector, never a reading of comb alone.

Checked 2026-10-30 against: Bee poisoning incidents in Germany in spring 2008 caused by abrasion of active substance from treated seeds during sowing of maize (Julius-Kühn-Archiv 423 (Pistorius, Bischoff, Heimbach and Stähler; Julius Kühn-Institut), 2009); Investigation procedures in England (Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme) (Health and Safety Executive, 2026); Feeding sugar to bees (Best Practice Guideline No. 7a) (National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency, 2026); Preparing honey bee colonies for winter (Fact Sheet 19) (National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency, 2026); Northern Ireland Honey Bee Husbandry Survey 2025-26 (Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (Kirbas, Spaans and Murchie), 2026); Foulbrood disease of honey bees and other common brood disorders (National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency, 2025).

The Northern Ireland survey gives a sense of proportion, with its limits. For winter 2025-26, beekeepers classed 66 of 130 lost colonies as unsolvable queen problems, 50 as dead or empty, and 14 as natural hazards. Of the 50 dead colonies, 8 had workers dead in cells with no food left, and 20 had them dead in cells with food still present — the second picture is not simple starvation. Those are respondents' descriptions, from 101 volunteers; the colony losses guide sets out what they can and cannot show.

Poisoning: what a real incident looked like

The best-documented large incident in Europe is the one in Germany's Upper Rhine valley in spring 2008. In late April and May, more than 11,500 colonies of about 700 beekeepers showed dying bees with cramping, disorientation and abnormal wing movements, in front of and inside the hives, with up to several thousand dead a day per colony. Damage ranged from 10 to 90% of a colony, and total losses were few. The cause was dust abraded from maize seed treated with the insecticide clothianidin, blown off the fields by pneumatic drills during sowing.

What settled it was not the signs. Germany's federal examination centre for bee poisoning analysed dust, plants, dead bees, fresh pollen and bee bread and found the insecticide residue, and screened bee samples for varroa, Nosema and amoebae, finding no correlation with pathogens. Both halves mattered: a residue alone does not prove a residue killed the bees, and a pathogen screen alone cannot rule a poisoning in or out. The same report notes that the region had recorded above-average winter losses, of up to about 40%, before the incident — a reminder that colonies can carry more than one problem at once.

How a pesticide could reach a colony

'Pesticides kill bees' runs four questions together. Is the substance hazardous to bees at all — a laboratory question, answered product by product? Does it reach bees by a given route, and how much? Was an effect on bees measured, and was that in a cage or in a field? And was a consequence for colonies documented in the field? The European Food Safety Authority's 2023 bee guidance assesses contact and dietary exposure through the treated crop, weeds in the field, field margins and adjacent crops reached by spray and dust drift, and the crop sown next. It left contaminated water out, because there were not enough data on how much bees drink to quantify it.

Hazard, exposure, effect and consequence, by pathwayA grid with one row per pathway and four columns. 8 rows; the caption lists each cell.HazardExposureEffectField consequenceDust abraded from insecticide-treated…A spray applied to a crop while bees a…Spray drifting beyond the treated fieldA systemic insecticide in a treated cr…Flowering weeds inside the treated fieldResidues persisting in soil after a tr…Water bees collect — puddles, surface…More than one product at once — an ins…ShownNot shownNot assessed
Eight ways a pesticide could reach a colony, each judged on four separate questions: is the substance hazardous to bees, does it reach them by this route, was an effect on bees measured, and was a consequence for colonies documented in the field. A filled circle means shown in the sources read; an open circle, not shown in them, which is not the same as shown to be absent; a dash, not assessed. Dust abraded from insecticide-treated seed at sowing: hazard shown, exposure shown, effect shown, field consequence shown. A spray applied to a crop while bees are on it: hazard shown, exposure shown, effect not shown, field consequence not shown. Spray drifting beyond the treated field: hazard shown, exposure shown, effect not shown, field consequence not shown. A systemic insecticide in a treated crop, including seed treatments: hazard shown, exposure shown, effect shown, field consequence shown. Flowering weeds inside the treated field: hazard shown, exposure shown, effect not shown, field consequence not shown. Residues persisting in soil after a treated crop: hazard shown, exposure shown, effect not shown, field consequence not shown. Water bees collect — puddles, surface water and the droplets plants exude (guttation): hazard shown, exposure not assessed, effect not shown, field consequence not shown. More than one product at once — an insecticide with a fungicide, or a tank mix: hazard shown, exposure shown, effect shown, field consequence not shown. Only the seed-dust incident in Germany in 2008 and one field experiment on oilseed rape show a field consequence; the table below gives each step's evidence and setting. Sources: Bee poisoning incidents in Germany in spring 2008 caused by abrasion of active substance from treated seeds during sowing of maize; Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees); Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees; Agrochemicals interact synergistically to increase bee mortality; Synergistic mortality between a neonicotinoid insecticide and an ergosterol-biosynthesis-inhibiting fungicide in three bee species. Drawing: HoneyHQ (HEKNO Ltd), original.
How a pesticide could reach a colony: hazard, exposure, effect and consequence, step by step
SourceRouteReachesHazardExposureEffect on beesField consequence
Dust abraded from insecticide-treated seed at sowingBlown off the field by pneumatic drills onto flowering crops, margins and foraging beesForagers in flight and on flowers; stores, through contaminated nectar and pollenShown — field incident. Clothianidin, an insecticide, was the active substance in the dust.Shown — field incident. Residues were found in the dust, in plants, in dead bees, in fresh pollen and in bee bread; some seed batches carried up to 80 g of dust per 100,000 kernels.Shown — field incident. Cramping, disorientation and abnormal wing movements, and up to several thousand dead bees a day per colony.Shown — field incident. More than 11,500 colonies of about 700 beekeepers in the Upper Rhine valley in spring 2008, with damage from 10 to 90% and few total losses. Pathogen screening found no correlation.
A spray applied to a crop while bees are on itDirect overspray, and contact with treated surfaces shortly afterwardsForagers on the cropShown — laboratory. Set substance by substance in laboratory tests before authorisation; it differs widely between products.Shown — regulatory assessment. The EU guidance treats overspray and fresh-residue contact as an acute route that can be lethal.Not shown in the sources read — laboratory. Depends on the product; no field measurement was read for this table.Not shown in the sources read — field incident. No field incident of this kind was read for this table.
Spray drifting beyond the treated fieldDeposition on flowering field margins and adjacent cropsForagers on margins and neighbouring cropsShown — laboratory. Set substance by substance in laboratory tests before authorisation; it differs widely between products.Shown — regulatory assessment. Field margins and adjacent crops are assessed scenarios; deposition comes from spray drift and from dust drift after sowing treated seed.Not shown in the sources read — laboratory. No measured effect was read for this table.Not shown in the sources read — field incident. No field incident of this kind was read for this table.
A systemic insecticide in a treated crop, including seed treatmentsCarried inside the plant into its nectar and pollenForagers, and the larvae and nurses fed on stored foodShown — laboratory. Set substance by substance in laboratory tests before authorisation; it differs widely between products.Shown — regulatory assessment. Dietary exposure through nectar and pollen in the treated crop is the core route the guidance assesses, for adults and larvae.Shown — field experiment. In a field experiment on oilseed rape in three countries, honey bee effects of neonicotinoid seed treatments were negative in Hungary and the UK and positive in Germany during flowering.Shown — field experiment. Hungarian colonies were 24% smaller the next spring. Effects differed by country, and the study's interpretation has been disputed.
Flowering weeds inside the treated fieldContaminated nectar and pollen of plants that were not the cropForagers working weeds in the cropShown — laboratory. Set substance by substance in laboratory tests before authorisation; it differs widely between products.Shown — regulatory assessment. Weeds in the treated field are an assessed scenario.Not shown in the sources read — laboratory. No measured effect was read for this table.Not shown in the sources read — field incident. No field incident of this kind was read for this table.
Residues persisting in soil after a treated cropTaken up by the crop sown next, and into its flowersForagers on the following cropShown — laboratory. Set substance by substance in laboratory tests before authorisation; it differs widely between products.Shown — regulatory assessment. The succeeding crop is an assessed scenario, for residues that persist in soil and are taken up by later crops.Not shown in the sources read — laboratory. No measured effect was read for this table.Not shown in the sources read — field incident. No field incident of this kind was read for this table.
Water bees collect — puddles, surface water and the droplets plants exude (guttation)Drunk and carried home for cooling and for diluting storesWater foragers, and the colony through themShown — laboratory. Set substance by substance in laboratory tests before authorisation; it differs widely between products.Not assessed — regulatory assessment. The EU guidance left contaminated water out because data on how much bees drink, and how often, were not enough to quantify it. Guttation appears only as a factor in reviewing which crops bees visit.Not shown in the sources read — laboratory. No measured effect was read for this table.Not shown in the sources read — field incident. No field incident of this kind was read for this table.
More than one product at once — an insecticide with a fungicide, or a tank mixAny of the routes above, carrying several substances togetherWhichever bees the routes reachShown — laboratory. A fungicide not very toxic on its own made an insecticide more lethal in three bee species in the laboratory, and a meta-analysis of 90 studies found agrochemical combinations synergistic for mortality.Shown — regulatory assessment. The 2023 guidance adds methods for products used as mixtures.Shown — laboratory. Synergistic mortality in cage tests; sublethal effects were additive or antagonistic.Not shown in the sources read — field experiment. The evidence is mostly from laboratories and cages; a field consequence was not measured in the sources read.

Each step is judged on its own evidence. A hazard shown in a laboratory is not an exposure in the field, an exposure is not an effect, and an effect in a cage is not a consequence for colonies. 'Not shown' means not shown in the sources read, not shown to be absent. No product, dose or use is given here; the label and the national authority govern those.

Checked 2026-10-30 against: Bee poisoning incidents in Germany in spring 2008 caused by abrasion of active substance from treated seeds during sowing of maize (Julius-Kühn-Archiv 423 (Pistorius, Bischoff, Heimbach and Stähler; Julius Kühn-Institut), 2009); Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees) (European Food Safety Authority (EFSA Journal 21(5):e07989), 2023); Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees (Science, 2017); Agrochemicals interact synergistically to increase bee mortality (Nature, 2021); Synergistic mortality between a neonicotinoid insecticide and an ergosterol-biosynthesis-inhibiting fungicide in three bee species (Pest Management Science, 2017).

Reporting a suspected poisoning

In England, a suspected pesticide poisoning of bees is investigated through the Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme, and the Health and Safety Executive's page says bee notifications often go straight to the National Bee Unit. Liaise with the NBU and the bee inspector from the start and say why a pesticide is suspected. At least 50 bees are enough for the standard tests: put them in a cardboard box, not a plastic bag, and freeze them if they cannot be sent at once. The NBU screens them for disease within 48 hours before they pass on for residue analysis. Where fumigants are suspected, do not collect samples at all. Natural England can be reached on freephone 0800 321 600 in office hours.

Where a suspected poisoning can be investigated
WhereCoversDutyWhen it appliesWhat to doRouteInstrument and date
EnglandAcute pesticide poisoningSuspected poisoning investigated — an official requestSuspecting that a pesticide killed or harmed bees.Tell the National Bee Unit and the bee inspector from the start, and say why a pesticide is suspected. Keep at least 50 recently dead bees in a cardboard box, not a plastic bag, frozen if they cannot be sent at once. Do not collect samples where a fumigant may be involved.The National Bee Unit or the local bee inspector; the scheme's freephone, 0800 321 600HSE, 'Investigation procedures in England' (updated 30 June 2026) — the procedure of an official scheme, not a statutory duty on the beekeeper. From 2026-06-30 (the procedure as last updated). HoneyHQ re-checks this rule by 2027-04-30.

Only the schemes HoneyHQ has read are listed. An investigation is a request the authority makes of beekeepers, not a legal duty; elsewhere, ask the national authority.

Checked 2026-10-30 against: Investigation procedures in England (Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme) (Health and Safety Executive, 2026); Incidents involving pesticides and animals: Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme (Natural England, Food and Environment Research Agency and HSE, 2012).

The scheme does not take further an incident where the animals died of something other than a pesticide — disease, starvation or injury — which is why the disease screen comes first. Scotland and Wales run their own arrangements, and Ireland and Northern Ireland have their own authorities; HoneyHQ has not read their poisoning routes, so it gives none. Ask the national authority. Where the dead bees show signs of a notifiable brood disease instead, the notifiable-disease rules apply, and a suspicion is reported at once.

The claims on this page

Every substantive claim is placed on a tier, and the top two tiers must also state what they are not claiming.

Commonly claimed, but not supported

Widely repeated and not supported by current evidence. Listed so the correction is here rather than only the claim.

Commonly claimed, but not supported

A carpet of dead bees in front of a hive proves pesticide poisoning.

The same scene can come from chronic bee paralysis, robbing or starvation. In the 2008 German incident, poisoning was established by residue analysis together with a pathogen screen, not from the signs; England's scheme likewise screens for disease before residue analysis.

What this does not claim: It is not a claim that poisonings do not happen or are rare — the 2008 incident affected more than 11,500 colonies — nor that the signs are useless; they are the reason to take a sample.

  • Bee poisoning incidents in Germany in spring 2008 caused by abrasion of active substance from treated seeds during sowing of maize — Julius-Kühn-Archiv 423 (Pistorius, Bischoff, Heimbach and Stähler; Julius Kühn-Institut) (2009) · Observational study Link
  • Chronic bee paralysis: an information note for beekeepers (Fact Sheet 10) — National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency (2024) · Regulatory guidance Link
  • Investigation procedures in England (Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme) — Health and Safety Executive (2026) · Regulatory guidance Link

Sources

  • Bee poisoning incidents in Germany in spring 2008 caused by abrasion of active substance from treated seeds during sowing of maize — Julius-Kühn-Archiv 423 (Pistorius, Bischoff, Heimbach and Stähler; Julius Kühn-Institut) (2009) · Observational study Link
  • Investigation procedures in England (Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme) — Health and Safety Executive (2026) · Regulatory guidance Link
  • Incidents involving pesticides and animals: Wildlife Incident Investigation Scheme — Natural England, Food and Environment Research Agency and HSE (2012) · Regulatory guidance Link
  • Chronic bee paralysis: an information note for beekeepers (Fact Sheet 10) — National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency (2024) · Regulatory guidance Link
  • Chronic bee paralysis as a serious emerging threat to honey bees — Nature Communications 11:2164 (2020) · Observational study Link
  • Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees) — European Food Safety Authority (EFSA Journal 21(5):e07989) (2023) · Regulatory guidance Link
  • Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees — Science (2017) · Peer-reviewed article
  • Agrochemicals interact synergistically to increase bee mortality — Nature (2021) · Meta-analysis
  • Synergistic mortality between a neonicotinoid insecticide and an ergosterol-biosynthesis-inhibiting fungicide in three bee species — Pest Management Science (2017) · Peer-reviewed article
  • Northern Ireland Honey Bee Husbandry Survey 2025-26 — Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (Kirbas, Spaans and Murchie) (2026) · Observational study Link
  • Feeding sugar to bees (Best Practice Guideline No. 7a) — National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency (2026) · Regulatory guidance Link
  • Preparing honey bee colonies for winter (Fact Sheet 19) — National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency (2026) · Regulatory guidance Link
  • Foulbrood disease of honey bees and other common brood disorders — National Bee Unit, Animal and Plant Health Agency (2025) · Regulatory guidance Link
  • Wasps (National Bee Unit fact sheet) — Animal and Plant Health Agency, National Bee Unit (2026) · Regulatory guidance Link
  • Chapter 3.2.7. Varroosis of honey bees (infestation of honey bees with Varroa spp.) — WOAH Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (2021) · Standards document Link
  • HoneyHQ editorial synthesis — HEKNO Ltd · HoneyHQ synthesis

How sources are selected and weighted is set out in the sources and evidence policy.

Read next

Tools that use this

HoneyHQ saves your cookie choice on this device. Optional analytics run only if you accept — set a preference now, or change it later on the cookies page.