Where honeydew comes from: the trees, the insects and the honey

Forest honey is not made from flowers. It is made from the sugary excretion of aphids, scale insects and planthoppers feeding on tree sap — and which insect it was matters more to the honey than which tree.

Honey scienceReviewed 2026-09-29

Three parties, not two

Phloem sap — the stream that carries a tree's sugars from its leaves to the rest of the plant — is rich in sugar and poor in nitrogen. An insect that lives on it has to pass a great deal of sap to collect enough protein, and it gets rid of the surplus sugar and water as droplets of honeydew. Aphids, soft and giant scale insects, planthoppers and psyllids all do this. Bees collect the droplets from needles, leaves and bark, add their enzymes, evaporate the water and store the result as honey.

So a honeydew honey has three parties where a floral honey has two. The tree supplies the raw material, the insect transforms it — adding sugars of its own making and changing the balance of those it passes — and the bee finishes it. No flower is involved and no pollination happens, which makes honeydew the clearest case of honey production and pollination being entirely separate things.

The documented chains

The table below lists the tree–insect links HoneyHQ has found documented in published surveys, analyses or reference descriptions of honey types. It is deliberately explicit about how each link is known, because honeydew writing routinely merges four different things — the tree the sap came from, the insect that processed it, the region the honey was made in, and a laboratory measurement — into a single confident sentence.

Tree, insect and honey: the documented honeydew chains
TreeInsectKind of insectWhereRoleHow the link is known
Silver fir (Abies alba)Cinara pectinatae (formerly Buchneria pectinatae)Aphid — Aphididae (Lachninae)Germany: Baden-Württemberg (sampled stands)Principal sourceHoneydew analysed
Silver fir (Abies alba)Cinara confinisAphid — Aphididae (Lachninae)Germany: Baden-Württemberg (sampled stands)Principal sourceHoneydew analysed
Norway spruce (Picea abies)Cinara piceaeAphid — Aphididae (Lachninae)Germany: Baden-Württemberg (sampled stands)Principal sourceHoneydew analysed
Norway spruce (Picea abies)Cinara pilicornisAphid — Aphididae (Lachninae)Germany: Baden-Württemberg (sampled stands)Principal sourceHoneydew analysed
Norway spruce (Picea abies)Physokermes piceaeSoft scale insect — CoccidaeGermany: Baden-Württemberg (sampled stands)Principal sourceHoneydew analysed
Norway spruce (Picea abies)Physokermes hemicryphusSoft scale insect — CoccidaeGermany: Baden-Württemberg (sampled stands)Principal sourceHoneydew analysed
Calabrian and Aleppo pines (Pinus brutia and Pinus halepensis)Marchalina hellenicaGiant scale insect — MarchalinidaeGreece; Türkiye: Muğla and the Aegean and Mediterranean provincesPrincipal sourceFound in a field survey
A very wide range of trees, shrubs and crops (Many indigenous and cultivated species)Metcalfa pruinosaPlanthopper — FlatidaeItaly; Slovenia; France; TürkiyePrincipal sourceNamed in a reference description
Black, mountain and red beech (Fuscospora (Nothofagus) solandri, F. fusca and relatives)Ultracoelostoma assimile and U. brittiniGiant scale insect — Coelostomidiidae (formerly placed in Margarodidae)New Zealand: Northern South Island beech forestPrincipal sourceFound in a field survey
Oaks and sweet chestnut (Quercus spp. and Castanea sativa)Lachnus roborisAphid — Aphididae (Lachninae)Türkiye: Kırklareli and BoluContributorFound in a field survey
Oaks and sweet chestnut (Quercus spp. and Castanea sativa)Parthenolecanium rufulumSoft scale insect — CoccidaeTürkiye: Kırklareli and BoluContributorFound in a field survey
Lime (linden) (Tilia spp.)Eucallipterus tiliaeAphid — Aphididae (Calaphidinae)EuropeContributorNamed in a reference description
Caucasian fir and oriental spruce (Abies nordmanniana and Picea orientalis)Marchalina caucasicaGiant scale insect — MarchalinidaeTürkiye: Giresun and Trabzon, Black Sea regionDocumented producerFound in a field survey
Turkish fir (Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmuelleriana)Physokermes hellenicusSoft scale insect — CoccidaeTürkiye: BoluDocumented producerFound in a field survey
Turkish fir (Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmuelleriana)Nemolecanium abietisSoft scale insect — CoccidaeTürkiye: BoluDocumented producerFound in a field survey
Cedar of Lebanon (Cedrus libani)Cinara cedriAphid — Aphididae (Lachninae)Türkiye: AntalyaDocumented producerFound in a field survey
Various trees and shrubs (Many host plants)Ricania simulansPlanthopper — RicaniidaeTürkiyeDocumented producerFound in a field survey
Tutu (Coriaria arborea (and C. sarmentosa))Scolypopa australisPlanthopper — RicaniidaeNew Zealand: Mainly north of 42°S; highest risk in northern Hawke's Bay, Bay of Plenty and CoromandelDocumented producerNamed in a reference description

'Honeydew analysed' means the insect's honeydew on that tree was sampled and measured; 'found in a field survey' that the insect was identified on the tree in a honey-producing forest; 'named in a reference description' that an authoritative description of the honey names it. None of these alone proves that a particular jar came from a particular insect.

Checked 2026-09-29 against: Sugar, amino acid and inorganic ion profiling of the honeydew from different hemipteran species feeding on Abies alba and Picea abies (PLOS ONE, 2020); The effect of cold periods on the biological cycle of Marchalina hellenica (Insects, 2022); Honeydew producing insects in some forests of Turkey and their potential to produce of honeydew honey (Baltic Forestry, 2020); Main European unifloral honeys: descriptive sheets (Apidologie, 2004); Establishment success of sooty beech scale insects, Ultracoelostoma sp., on different host tree species in New Zealand (Journal of Insect Science, 2006); Approval report — Proposal P1029: Maximum level for tutin in honey (Food Standards Australia New Zealand, 2015); Fluffy bums and their aliens: passionvine hoppers (Scolypopa australis (Walker)) and their elusive parasitoid wasps (Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2025).

The insect matters more than the tree

The clearest evidence comes from a study that collected honeydew straight from insect colonies — two aphids on silver fir, and two aphids and two scale insects on Norway spruce, at least fifteen colonies each, in Baden-Württemberg in 2016 and 2017. When the composition of every sample was compared, the insect species explained 47.8 per cent of the variation and the tree species 13.7 per cent. Two insects on the same spruce produced honeydew as different as honeydews from two different trees.

Melezitose, erlose and sucrose in honeydew straight from the insect, most melezitose first
InsectTreeMelezitose (% of sugars)Erlose (%)Sucrose (%)
Cinara piceaeNorway spruce48 ± 131 ± 211 ± 8
Cinara pilicornisNorway spruce36 ± 81 ± 230 ± 13
Physokermes piceaeNorway spruce13 ± 97 ± 435 ± 16
Cinara pectinataeSilver fir2 ± 215 ± 451 ± 13
Cinara confinisSilver fir2 ± 214 ± 724 ± 16
Physokermes hemicryphusNorway spruce2 ± 59 ± 1048 ± 22

Mean ± standard deviation, from at least fifteen samples per insect collected in Baden-Württemberg in 2016 and 2017. Honeydew as it leaves the insect, before bees add enzymes and evaporate it — so these are the raw material, not the honey.

Checked 2026-09-29 against: Sugar, amino acid and inorganic ion profiling of the honeydew from different hemipteran species feeding on Abies alba and Picea abies (PLOS ONE, 2020).

Melezitose is the sugar that makes the difference to a beekeeper. It is a three-part sugar made in the insect rather than the tree, and it is poorly soluble: honeydew rich in it can crystallise in the comb before it can be extracted, the 'cement honey' of central European forest beekeeping. The black spruce aphid, Cinara piceae, produced honeydew that was on average 48 per cent melezitose. The two fir aphids produced almost none. That one fact explains more about a forest honey's behaviour in the jar than the name of the tree on its label.

Why honeydew honey tests differently

The insect's contribution shows up in every standard measurement. In the European reference data, honeydew honeys carry less fructose and glucose combined — under 60 grams in every hundred against about 70 for blossom honeys — because the insect-made sugars take up the difference. They turn polarised light to the right where every blossom honey turns it to the left. They conduct electricity more strongly, because honeydew has passed through both a tree and an insect and carries more minerals. And under the microscope they show honeydew elements — fungal hyphae, spores and single-celled algae that grow on sugary leaf surfaces — alongside pollen from wind-pollinated trees that offer bees no nectar at all.

One honeydew honey is chemically distinct enough to be described on its own: the honey made from the excretion of Metcalfa pruinosa, a North American planthopper that reached Europe at the end of the 1970s. It has the highest conductivity of any type in the European descriptions, an acidity that can exceed the general legal limit, and a high dextrin content — and because the planthopper feeds on hundreds of plants, it can be produced in landscapes with no forest at all.

Why a honeydew flow cannot be planned

A floral flow follows a flowering calendar. A honeydew flow follows an insect population, and insect populations boom and crash for reasons invisible from the ground — weather, predators, parasitoids, the condition of the tree. In the Turkish forest survey, the cedar aphid was present in small numbers with very little honeydew in 2016 and 2017 and then built a large population in the autumn of 2018. Beekeepers who depend on honeydew move colonies into the forest at short notice when a flow appears, and some years there is none.

The giant pine scale behind Greek and Turkish pine honey is the partial exception, because it is a single, well-studied insect with one generation a year: it overwinters as a young nymph and produces its heaviest honeydew in March and April, before its final moult. Greek entomologists report pine honey as about 60 per cent of Greece's annual honey production, which makes the country's honey output unusually dependent on one scale insect. The insect has also been moved deliberately into new pine stands to create honey flows — a practice argued over on forest-health grounds.

The claims on this page

Every substantive claim is placed on a tier, and the top two tiers must also state what they are not claiming.

Emerging research

Real studies exist and point somewhere, but they are small, in vitro, in animals, or not yet replicated. Direction is not the same as a result.

Emerging research

In honeydew collected from silver fir and Norway spruce, the insect species explained more of the variation in composition than the tree species.

Honeydew collected directly from colonies of six hemipteran species on two conifers in south-west Germany in 2016–2017 showed composition driven mainly by the insect (47.8% of variance) rather than the tree (13.7%), with melezitose ranging from about 2% of sugars in fir aphid honeydew to about 48% in the black spruce aphid's.

What this does not claim: It does not show that the same proportions hold for other trees, other regions or other years, and it describes honeydew as excreted — not the finished honey, whose composition bees change. It does not identify the insect behind any particular jar.

  • Sugar, amino acid and inorganic ion profiling of the honeydew from different hemipteran species feeding on Abies alba and Picea abies — PLOS ONE (2020) · Peer-reviewed article Link

Sources

  • Sugar, amino acid and inorganic ion profiling of the honeydew from different hemipteran species feeding on Abies alba and Picea abies — PLOS ONE (2020) · Peer-reviewed article Link
  • Honeydew producing insects in some forests of Turkey and their potential to produce of honeydew honey — Baltic Forestry (2020) · Peer-reviewed article Link
  • The effect of cold periods on the biological cycle of Marchalina hellenica — Insects (2022) · Peer-reviewed article Link
  • Establishment success of sooty beech scale insects, Ultracoelostoma sp., on different host tree species in New Zealand — Journal of Insect Science (2006) · Peer-reviewed article Link
  • Main European unifloral honeys: descriptive sheets — Apidologie (2004) · Peer-reviewed article Link
  • Standard for Honey (CXS 12-1981) — Codex Alimentarius Commission, FAO/WHO (1981) · Standards document Link
  • HoneyHQ editorial synthesis — HEKNO Ltd · HoneyHQ synthesis

How sources are selected and weighted is set out in the sources and evidence policy.

Read next

Tools that use this

HoneyHQ saves your cookie choice on this device. Optional analytics run only if you accept — set a preference now, or change it later on the cookies page.